Service interruption on Monday 11 July from 12:30 to 13:00: all the sites of the CCSD (HAL, Epiciences, SciencesConf, AureHAL) will be inaccessible (network hardware connection).
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Preprints, Working Papers, ...

Evaluating Ambiguous Offerings

Abstract : This paper studies how audience members categorize and evaluate ambiguous offerings. Depending on whether audience members categorize ambiguous offerings based on prototypes or goals, they activate two distinct cognitive mechanisms and evaluate differently ambiguous offerings. We expect that when audiences engage in goal-based vs. prototype-based categorization, their evaluation of ambiguous products increases. We theorize that under goal-based categorization, the perceived utility of unclear attributes increases for audiences, which leads them to evaluate more positively ambiguous product offerings. We test and find support for these direct and mediated relationships through a series of lab, on-line and field experiments. Overall, this study offers important implications for research on product and market categories, optimal distinctiveness, and market agents’ cognitive ascription of value.
Document type :
Preprints, Working Papers, ...
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Antoine Haldemann Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, December 23, 2021 - 4:01:13 PM
Last modification on : Friday, December 24, 2021 - 3:27:42 AM

Links full text





Romain Boulongne, Rodolphe Durand. Evaluating Ambiguous Offerings. 2020. ⟨hal-03501699⟩



Record views