Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Preprints, Working Papers, ...

Judgment Aggregation Theory Can Entail New Social Choice Results

Abstract : Judgment (or logical) aggregation theory is logically more powerful than social choice theory and has been put to use to recover some classic results of this field. Whether it could also enrich it with genuinely new results is still controversial. To support a positive answer, we prove a social choice theorem by using the advanced nonbinary form of judgment aggregation theory developed by Dokow and Holzman (2010c). This application involves aggregating classifications (specifically assignments) instead of preferences, and this focus justifies shifting away from the binary framework of standard judgement aggregation theory to a more general one.
Document type :
Preprints, Working Papers, ...
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-hec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02018546
Contributor : Antoine Haldemann Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, February 13, 2019 - 9:39:50 PM
Last modification on : Saturday, June 25, 2022 - 10:56:29 AM

Licence

Copyright

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-02018546, version 1

Collections

HEC | CNRS

Citation

François Maniquet, Philippe Mongin. Judgment Aggregation Theory Can Entail New Social Choice Results. 2014. ⟨hal-02018546⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

23