Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Preprints, Working Papers, ...

Decision Theory Made Relevant: Between the Software and the Shrink

Abstract : Decision theory offers a formal approach to decision making, which is often viewed and taught as the rational way to approach managerial decisions. Half a century ago it generated high hopes of capturing and perhaps replacing intuition, and providing the “right” answer in practically all managerial situations. Today it seems fair to say that decision theory has not lived up to these expectations. Behavioral science provides ample evidence that managers fail to follow the dicta of decision theory, even when these are explained to them. As a result, executives often find decision theory frustrating and useless and prefer to rely on their intuition. This paper suggests that this extreme conclusion is unwarranted and calls for a re-appraisal of decision theory. We propose that it should not always be regarded as a mathematical tool that produces the answer; rather, it can be viewed as a framework for a dialog between the decision maker and the decision theorist. In one extreme, the decision theorist studies the problem and provides the “correct’’ answer. But in another, the decision theorist only challenges the decision maker’s intuition and logic. In between, a whole gamut of possible dialogs exists, in which decision theory doesn’t replace intuition, but supports and refines it.
Document type :
Preprints, Working Papers, ...
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal-hec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01933885
Contributor : Antoine Haldemann <>
Submitted on : Saturday, November 24, 2018 - 3:56:16 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, September 23, 2020 - 4:28:00 AM

Licence


Copyright

Identifiers

Citation

Itzhak Gilboa, Maria Rouziou, Olivier Sibony. Decision Theory Made Relevant: Between the Software and the Shrink. 2018. ⟨hal-01933885⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

124