HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

So what if the clock strikes? Scheduling style, control, and well-being.

Abstract : Individuals vary in the way they schedule their daily tasks and activities. In particular, 2 scheduling styles are commonly followed: clock-time (where tasks are organized based on a clock) and event-time (where tasks are organized based on their order of completion). This research shows that adopting a clock-time or an event-time scheduling style has consequences that go beyond the direct effect on task organization. In particular, adopting 1 scheduling style versus the other is shown to potentially influence personal control and well-being. We demonstrate that the reliance on clock- versus event-time affects individuals’ perception of the causal relationship between events in the social world (Experiments 1 and 2). Specifically, we show that individuals following clock-time rather than event-time discriminate less between causally related and causally unrelated events, which in turn increases their belief that the world is controlled by chance or fate. In contrast, individuals following event-time (vs. clock-time) appear to believe that things happen more as a result of their own actions. We further show that this difference in internal locus of control compromises the ability of individuals following clock-time to savor positive emotions (Experiments 3a–5). We discuss the implications of these findings for future research in social and cognitive psychology.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Contributor : Antoine Haldemann Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, December 19, 2014 - 11:19:19 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, August 13, 2019 - 11:00:07 AM




Anne-Laure Sellier, Tamar Avnet. So what if the clock strikes? Scheduling style, control, and well-being.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2014, 107 (5), pp.791-808. ⟨10.1037/a0038051⟩. ⟨hal-01097582⟩



Record views