Do financial professionals behave according to prospect theory? An experimental study

Abstract : Prospect theory is increasingly used to explain deviations from the traditional paradigm of rational agents. Empirical support for prospect theory comes mainly from laboratory experiments using student samples. It is obviously important to know whether and to what extent this support generalizes to more naturally occurring circumstances. This article explores this question and measures prospect theory for a sample of private bankers and fund managers. We obtained clear support for prospect theory. Our financial professionals behaved according to prospect theory and violated expected utility maximization. They were risk averse for gains and risk seeking for losses and their utility was concave for gains and (slightly) convex for losses. They were also averse to losses, but less so than commonly observed in laboratory studies and assumed in behavioral finance. A substantial minority focused on gains and largely ignored losses, behavior reminiscent of what caused the current financial crisis.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Theory and Decision, Springer Verlag, 2013, 74 (3), pp.411-429. 〈10.1007/s11238-011-9282-3〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-hec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01069185
Contributeur : Amaury Bouvet <>
Soumis le : dimanche 28 septembre 2014 - 17:03:34
Dernière modification le : jeudi 11 janvier 2018 - 06:19:32

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Mohammed Abdellaoui, Han Bleichrodt, Hilda Kammoun. Do financial professionals behave according to prospect theory? An experimental study. Theory and Decision, Springer Verlag, 2013, 74 (3), pp.411-429. 〈10.1007/s11238-011-9282-3〉. 〈hal-01069185〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

138