HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

The susceptibility of mental accounting principles to evaluation mode effects

Abstract : The present research shows that the predictions and outcomes of mental-accounting tests depend on whether preferences are measured separately (one at a time) or jointly (comparatively). Across five studies, we show that joint evaluation weakens some decision biases (the theater ticket problem, the calculator and jacket problem), but exacerbates others (the basketball game problem). Joint evaluations serve as a check on whether people think the answers they give in separate evaluations make sense or require adjustment. We discuss how the findings impact (1) tests of mental accounting predictions (between vs. within subjects designs), and (2) the normative status of mental accounting.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Contributor : Antoine Haldemann Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, February 10, 2012 - 2:54:24 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, October 19, 2021 - 4:05:55 PM

Links full text




Subimal Chatterjee, Timothy B. Heath, Junhong Min. The susceptibility of mental accounting principles to evaluation mode effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Wiley, 2009, vol. 22, issue 2, p. 120-137. ⟨10.1002/bdm.616⟩. ⟨hal-00668834⟩



Record views