Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Reports

Majority Vote Following a debate

Abstract : Voters determine their preferences over alternatives based on cases (or arguments) that are raised in the public debate. Each voter is characterized by a matrix, measuring how much support each case lends to each alternative, and her ranking is additive in cases. We show that the majority vote in such a society can be any function from sets of cases to binary relations over alternatives. A similar result holds for voting with quota in the case of two alternatives.
Complete list of metadata

https://hal-hec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00593646
Contributor : Antoine Haldemann Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Monday, May 16, 2011 - 7:52:52 PM
Last modification on : Saturday, June 25, 2022 - 10:52:00 AM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-00593646, version 1

Collections

HEC | CNRS | LARA

Citation

Itzhak Gilboa, Nicolas Vieille. Majority Vote Following a debate. 2002. ⟨hal-00593646⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

104