Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation

Betting on Machina's reflection example : an Experiment on Ambiguity

Abstract : In a recent paper, Machina (2008) suggested choice problems in the spirit of Ellsberg (1961) which challenge tail-separability, an implication of Choquet Expected Utility (CEU) to a similar extent as the Ellsberg paradox challenged the sure-thing principle implied by Subjective Expected Utility (SEU). We have tested choice behavior for bets on one of Machina's choice problems, the reflection example. Our results indicate that tail-separability is violated by a large majority of subjects (over 70% of the sample). These empirical findings complement the theoretical analysis of Machina (2008) and, together, they confirm the need for new approaches in the analysis of ambiguity for decision making.
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Antoine Haldemann Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, March 25, 2011 - 5:18:09 PM
Last modification on : Saturday, June 25, 2022 - 10:51:51 AM


  • HAL Id : hal-00580032, version 1



Olivier L'Haridon, Laetitia Placido. Betting on Machina's reflection example : an Experiment on Ambiguity. 2008. ⟨hal-00580032⟩



Record views