HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Utilitarian Aggregation of Beliefs and Tastes

Abstract : Several authors have indicated a contradiction between consistent aggregation of subjective beliefs and tastes, and a Pareto condition. We argue that the Pareto condition that implies the contradiction is not compelling. Society should not necessarily endorse a unanimous choice when it is based on contradictory beliefs. Restricting the Pareto condition to choices that only involve identical beliefs allows a utilitarian aggregation: both society's utility function and its probability measure are linear combinations of those of the individuals.
Complete list of metadata

Contributor : Antoine Haldemann Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, May 6, 2010 - 11:55:36 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, November 14, 2012 - 11:17:13 PM




Itzhak Gilboa, D. Samet, D. Schmeidler. Utilitarian Aggregation of Beliefs and Tastes. Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, 2004, vol. 112, pp.932-938. ⟨10.1086/421173⟩. ⟨hal-00481249⟩



Record views