HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Causation, counterfactuals, and competitive advantage

Abstract : Causation is still poorly understood in strategy research, and confusion prevails around key concepts such as competitive advantage. In this paper, we define epistemological conditions that help dispel some of this confusion and provide a basis for more developed approaches. In particular, we argue that a counterfactual approach - one that builds on a systematic analysis of what-if questions - can advance our understanding of key causal mechanisms in strategy research. We offer two concrete methodologies - counterfactual history and causal modeling - as useful solutions. We also show that these methodologies open up new avenues in research on competitive advantage. Counterfactual history can add to our understanding of the context-specific construction of resource-based competitive advantage and path dependence, and causal modeling can help to reconceptualize the relationships between resources and performance. In particular, resource properties can be regarded as mediating mechanisms in these causal relationships. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Complete list of metadata

Contributor : Antoine Haldemann Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 2:49:36 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, January 11, 2018 - 6:19:31 AM

Links full text




Rodolphe Durand, Eero Vaara. Causation, counterfactuals, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, Wiley, 2009, Vol. 30, n° 12, pp. 1245-1264. ⟨10.1002/smj.793⟩. ⟨hal-00457799⟩



Record views